> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.frictionai.co/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# Actions: Prompts

> Find underperforming prompts and inspect the response evidence behind recommended fixes.

# Actions: Prompts

Actions: Prompts surfaces prompts where the brand underperforms across visibility, sentiment, or purchase intent. It is the fastest way to move from score diagnosis to a fix list.

<Frame>
  <img src="https://mintcdn.com/friction/GwaVVezuSSMLCKiT/images/actions-hub.svg?fit=max&auto=format&n=GwaVVezuSSMLCKiT&q=85&s=931a40a0bd261da72409cd595efe4b93" alt="Actions prompt hub showing blindspot counts, underperforming prompts, and a detail drawer" width="960" height="520" data-path="images/actions-hub.svg" />
</Frame>

## What appears here

<CardGroup cols={2}>
  <Card title="Underperforming prompts" icon="triangle-exclamation">
    Prompts where the brand is weak, missing, negatively framed, or losing the recommendation.
  </Card>

  <Card title="Metric scope" icon="sliders">
    Filter by all metrics or a single metric: visibility, sentiment, or purchase intent.
  </Card>

  <Card title="Provider evidence" icon="brain">
    Filter by provider and inspect how each model responded.
  </Card>

  <Card title="Detail drawer" icon="table-columns">
    Open prompt evidence, response text, recommendations, sources, and search keywords.
  </Card>
</CardGroup>

## Filters

<AccordionGroup>
  <Accordion title="Metric">
    Use all metrics for triage, then isolate visibility, sentiment, or purchase intent when you need a cleaner fix list.
  </Accordion>

  <Accordion title="Source">
    Filter by custom prompts or system prompts so you know whether the issue came from your own tracking set or brand-health analysis.
  </Accordion>

  <Accordion title="Provider">
    Filter to one provider when a weak answer appears to be model-specific.
  </Accordion>

  <Accordion title="Search">
    Search prompt text when you are investigating a category, product line, campaign, or competitor.
  </Accordion>
</AccordionGroup>

## Use the detail drawer

<Steps>
  <Step title="Open a prompt">
    Click an underperforming row to open the right-side detail panel.
  </Step>

  <Step title="Read the score display">
    Confirm which metric is weak and how severe the issue is.
  </Step>

  <Step title="Inspect the answer evidence">
    Look at the explanation, response text, competitor mentions, source evidence, and recommendation cards.
  </Step>

  <Step title="Decide the fix type">
    Most fixes are content coverage, source quality, comparison positioning, product proof, or entity clarity.
  </Step>
</Steps>

## Fix patterns

<Tabs>
  <Tab title="Visibility">
    Create or improve content that directly answers the missing prompt intent. Strengthen source authority and category association.
  </Tab>

  <Tab title="Sentiment">
    Address the source or narrative creating cautious, mixed, or negative framing. Add recent proof, reviews, customer outcomes, or corrections.
  </Tab>

  <Tab title="Purchase intent">
    Improve comparison, use-case, pricing, review, and product proof pages so AI has evidence to recommend you.
  </Tab>
</Tabs>

<Tip>
  Prioritize prompt blindspots that repeat across providers or map to high-value commercial intent. One weak answer is less important than a repeated pattern.
</Tip>
